beta
Text
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 20,100,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from January 25, 2017 to October 11, 2017.
Reasons
1. Determination on the main claim
A. In full view of the facts that there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment as to the cause of the claim, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 4, the plaintiff is a person engaged in the construction of teine film, and the defendant is a stock company engaged in real estate management and sale business, etc., and the plaintiff was awarded a contract from the defendant Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building C (hereinafter "the building of this case") for the repair of the building of this case, around October 2016. The plaintiff thereafter constructed the teine film of the 2,3th and the above construction, and the teine film of the 4,5th and the 5th class were to be constructed by other companies (hereinafter "the previous construction work of this case"), and the plaintiff completed the construction of teine film of the previous construction of this case with 0 teine film of 00,000 won and 10,0000 won from 20,000 won to 10,000 teine No. 27.
According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the construction cost of KRW 20,100,000 and the delay damages therefor.
B. Accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff 20,100,000 won and damages for delay at the rate of 6% per annum as stipulated in the Commercial Act from January 25, 2017 to October 11, 2017, which is clearly indicated that it is the delivery date of a copy of the instant complaint from January 25, 2017, which is the day following the completion date of the instant construction work, and 15% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day
2. Determination as to the defendant's defense and counterclaim against the principal lawsuit
A. The building subject to the Defendant’s assertion is a welfare house for the aged and children.