1. The defendant shall pay 37,366,00 won to the plaintiff and 12% per annum from January 14, 2020 to the day of complete payment.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a juristic person that runs the interior building construction business. The plaintiff is a man-made retailer and the defendant.

B. From 2012, the Plaintiff began transactions with the Defendant, and among the projects that the Defendant received, the film and film construction was subcontracted by the Defendant for the interior door, door mold, image, etc. of the building, and was traded by the Defendant in the manner of paying the construction cost after the completion of the construction without paying the down payment.

C. In 2018, the Plaintiff, a construction site awarded by the Defendant during the period of 2018, performed a test film work at the site of D Driving Schools, E companies, F companies, G buildings, I companies located in H, J buildings, K companies, and L buildings.

In addition, the defendant paid 50160,000 won to the plaintiff as construction cost.

As of December 28, 2018, the Plaintiff’s finding the Defendant changed the construction cost details related to the construction works executed by the Plaintiff. As of December 28, 2018, the Defendant’s employees included “1.67,00 won carried forward in the preceding year, KRW 52,616,00,00, KRW 1.670,000, KRW 2410,000,000, Company E on January 24, 26, KRW 2600,000, KRW 6760,000, KRW 1560, G building, KRW 29,000, KRW 190, KRW 370,000, KRW 360,000, KRW 676,575,000, KRW 360,000, KRW 505,000, KRW 675,575,000” (the remainder of the construction cost).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 12, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserts that the above construction work has been completed, while the defendant asserts that the construction work cannot be paid because the completion of each of the above construction work has not been proved.

On the other hand, after the completion of the construction work, the Defendant paid the construction cost to the Plaintiff after the examination and examination. However, when the Defendant paid part of the construction cost to the Plaintiff, the Defendant completed the construction work.