logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2016.03.23 2014가단33352
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 14,052,50 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from November 5, 2014 to March 23, 2016.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 4, according to the Plaintiff’s respective entry, it is recognized that the Plaintiff, who runs an electronic component manufacturing business under the trade name of “B,” supplied the Defendant a total of KRW 127,502,485 won (including value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) to the Defendant on October 7, 2013 through November 29, 2013, and received KRW 42,465,697 from the Defendant on January 29, 2014.

B. Therefore, barring any other circumstances, the Defendant is obligated to pay the remainder of the goods price of 85,036,788 won (127,502,485 won - 42,465,697 won) and damages for delay to the Plaintiff.

2. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. The summary of the party's assertion 1) The defendant suffered a total of 85,036,788 won due to the defective supply of films by the plaintiff, and thus, the plaintiff's claim for the purchase price of the goods is deducted from the above damage claim. Therefore, the defendant does not have any amount of the purchase price of the goods to be paid to the plaintiff.

However, the defendant's sewage-oriented company C had employees who have no professional knowledge and skills at a clean place and had them wear and work for general decorations where foreign substances are stored.

The defendant also used an inferior heat pressure-driven machine with good performance.

As a result, there is a loss in the amount of punishment for the products combined with the products supplied by the plaintiff.

In addition, it was found that the failure and failure in the reduction was not directly found in the semi-finished products supplied by the defendant, but in the process of the defendant's contracting company.

Therefore, the above defect is not due to the defect in films supplied by the plaintiff, and the plaintiff is not liable for damages to the defendant.

B. 1) The Exemplary Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Exemplary”) is recognized.

) It is an enterprise that produces the Flexi’s PCB, so-called FPCB.

The production process is adjacent to the second floor adjacent to the formation of the gold circuit, which will be set up in the original plate foundation.

arrow