1. All the claims of the plaintiff and the plaintiff succeeding intervenor are dismissed.

2. Of the costs of lawsuit, the part resulting from succession.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a person who operates us's hospitals (hereinafter "Defendant hospital") in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 70 Haak-ro (Seoul Metropolitan Government Haak-dong).

As seen below, the Plaintiff is a person who received conical livers from the Defendant Hospital more than twice.

B. On August 12, 2011, the Plaintiff complained of the pains, left shoulders, the pains of the dog, and the decline in the influence of the dog. On August 12, 201, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on August 22, 201 as follows: (a) on the left-hand side of the inter-specopic region, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and was diagnosed as follows: (b) on August 22, 201, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on August 23, 201; (c) on the 23th day of the same month, the Plaintiff dive signboards between 3 through 6 square meters; and (d) inserted the artificial structure into that place; and (d) then received a pre-scopic sign and anti-copic surgery with the content of attaching the fixing machinery to the front body.

3) However, even after the first operation of this case, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms, such as the back side of the shoulder, the pain of the shoulder, and the left wale, etc., and the result of the examination by the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital verified that the back wale of the structure inserted between the drilling No. 3 and No. 4 at the time of the said operation was found. Accordingly, on September 8, 2011, the Plaintiff attached the metal fixing apparatus to the back side of the constal at the Defendant Hospital’s hospital, attached the metal fixing apparatus to the forward side of the constal of the constal of the constal at the Defendant Hospital No. 3 through No. 6, and, on September 8, 2011, referred to as “the second operation of this case” in the first operation of the front line, the “each of this case” is referred to as “the first operation.

(4) After receiving the Plaintiff’s hospitalization, the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital was discharged from the hospital on September 26, 2011. (4) From August 29, 2011 to September 21, 2011, the Plaintiff, a kind of anti-cination of anti-cination (name Vancomycin or hanomycin), and the Plaintiff, on September 201.