logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.18 2011가합88769
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The plaintiff A is the defendant school foundation F (hereinafter "the defendant school").

) H Hospital operated by the H Hospital (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff C and Plaintiff E, and Plaintiff E is the mother of Plaintiff A.

B. On October 8, 2008, Plaintiff A complained of the pains, etc. from Defendant G at the Defendant Hospital, upon receiving the first medical treatment from Defendant G, and Defendant G confirmed that the throst body was destroyed by the 6th square meters in light of the result of the X-ray test against Plaintiff A, and had the Plaintiff undergo MRI (MI) inspection against Plaintiff A at the time of the second medical examination on October 20, 2008. Defendant G explained that the 5-6th anniversary of the MRI inspection was suspected to have vert infection occurred, and that the verts were subject to severe pressure on the bones, and thus, the destruction of bones and the frost body, other than the frostal body, had already been urged to undergo severe pressure on the frost body of the Plaintiff at the time of the second medical examination.

C. 1) Plaintiff A was hospitalized at Defendant Hospital to undergo an operation on October 23, 2008, and from October 24, 2008 to October 13:25, 2008, Plaintiff A performed an operation on the part of Defendant G on the 5-6 plane from Defendant G (hereinafter “the first operation”).

(1) At the time of the first operation, Defendant G confirmed that salt was influencing satis infinites between 5-6 and 5 satisfinites, and 6 satisfinites, and removed part of the infected bones, and approach up to 5-6 satisfinated satisfins by removing confinor ( disc) between 5-6 satisfinsat and satisfining satisfins. At that time, Defendant G reduced the size of the satf in which the satisf infinsatisf infins at the time of satisfining, and that satisfins were transplanted between 5-6 satisfin and sat.

arrow