The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and eight hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable in light of the following circumstances: (b) comprehensively taking account of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all other sentencing conditions, such as the following: (c) the head of the Tong, who transferred the Defendant, used the head of the Tong who was subject to several times to commit the singishing fraud; and (d) the head of the Tong, who was subject to the disposition of suspension of indictment, has been subject to several investigations, etc.; and (e) the head of the Tong transferred by him, could have been sufficiently aware of the fact

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.