The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two million won in penalty) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unaffortunate, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s leased passbook was used for the criminal act of Bosing, and the nature of the crime was not mitigated; (b) the Defendant’s leased passbook was used for the criminal act of drinking; and (c) the fact that two passbooks were substituted; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime; and (e) the following circumstances

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.