logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.01 2018고정1439
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who works in a village bus company.

On February 23, 2018, at around 16:00, C companies located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, received victim D, 41 years of age as a village bus office in which they worked, and received as a certified gallon 8 mobile phone loss in the market value equivalent to one million won in the bus.

However, it did not take measures such as finding a master and had been kept in the office to sell it.

Gallon 8 mobile phones have been stolen by bringing 8 mobile phones to their own house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness D;

1. Character messages between the victim and the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [The following circumstances indicated in the record, i.e., the victim’s portable phone was kept in custody in the company where the defendant works, and the defendant did not have any contact with the portable phone.

주장 하나, 피해자는 휴대 전화기를 분실한 다음날 자신의 휴대 전화기로 전화하였던 점, 피해 자가 위와 같이 전화를 하였을 당시 신호가 감에도 불구하고 아무도 전화를 받지 않았던 점, 피해자의 휴대 전화기 케이스에는 피해자의 신용카드가 들어 있어 신용카드 회사를 통해 유실물인 휴대전화 기의 주인을 충분히 찾아 줄 수 있었던 점, 그러나 피고인은 위와 같은 방법으로 휴대 전화기의 소유자를 찾아보지 않은 채 위 휴대 전화기를 자신의 집으로 가져간 뒤 분실 휴대 전화기 장 물업자에게 연락하였던 점, 피고인은 실제로 위 휴대 전화기를 판매할 의사는 없었고 단지 장물업자가 괘씸하여 골탕을 먹이려는 의도로 거래를 진행한...

arrow