logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.01.07 2015고단4759
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 5, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for occupational embezzlement, fraud, accusation, embezzlement, etc. by the Daegu District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 19, 2015.

"2015 Highest 4759"

1. The defendant was liable for the theft in connection with the past transactional relation with mobile phones;

C was willing to substitute the debt by creating a heavy portable phone for the victim D.

On July 16, 2013, the Defendant had been in the office of the victim D of the Building 000 in Daegu, Seogu, Daegu, 22:30.

F Call to F and instruct C to provide a cellular phone for the victim D who was in custody in the safe office and was in custody in the safe office, and upon the direction of the Defendant, F who is not aware of the aforementioned circumstances, was in the aggregate of S2 (M250S) and 2.80,000,000 won in the market price of the above office, and 14,000,000,000 won in Samsung Gallet 1 (E160S) in the market price of Samsung Gallet 1 (E1.60,000,000 won in the market price of Samsung Gallet 1 (E1.60,000 won), and 18,000,000,000 won in the market price of 3,770,000,000 won in the market price of the above office (E250,000 won in the market price of 3,000,0000 won in the market price of 3.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the 84 mobile phone, which was 30,180,000 won in total, of the market prices owned by the victim D.

2. Occupational embezzlement from June 10, 2013 to the same year;

8. Until October, Daegu Seo-gu E building No. 000, a company that purchases heavy and portable telephone devices operated by the victim D has been engaged in the purchase and sale of heavy and portable telephone devices.

The defendant had purchased a second-hand telephone for the above period and received the price of KRW 50 million after selling it to China, and the sales proceeds from the Chinese company were not paid.

A damaged person is belonging to the victim and arbitrarily consumed for the purpose of repayment of the defendant's debt.

arrow