Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2017 Highest 5059] On September 10, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “C”, a trading site on the Internet, sells gallon 5,00 won of the pertinent goods on the “C” page, which is a trading site on the Internet, and decided to sell the relevant goods to the victim D who contacted with the said fact.
The respondent, however, did not have any intention or ability to sell the goods in question from the beginning under the above conditions.
The respondent was paid KRW 1,530,000 in total on seven occasions, such as the payment of KRW 2,50,000 to his bank account on the day from the victim D, as shown in the list of crimes.
[2017 Highest 5512] The Defendant posted a notice to the effect that the Defendant sells heavy and valuable telephone appliances on the Internet website “C” and online fcartop c, which trade heavy goods using the Internet’s anonymousity, and that the Defendant reported it to the effect that “on the first hand hand, the Defendant will send the proceeds of the heavy and portable telephone to the door-to the door-to-door,” and that “on the first hand-on, the Defendant will send them to the door-to-door,” and did not deliver them. The Defendant received money by fraud.
1. On October 28, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “H 5.64GB shall be sold in KRW 1.70,000,000” on the said C’s website at a gallon site on October 25, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would transfer KRW 1.60,000 to the victim G with a gallon message, etc.” to the effect that “The Defendant would transfer the gallon 5 telephone portable phone on the gallon’s face to send the gallon gallon ju to the Defendant.”
However, the defendant did not have the above portable phone, and there was only the idea that he will receive the money in the name of the above mobile phone from the victim, and even if he received the money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to send the above mobile phone machine to the victim on his own.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above.