Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of three million won, by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인 A 피고인은 2016. 11. 20. 08:15 경 오산시 C에 있는 D 식당 앞에서 행패 소란 신고를 받고 출동한 화성 동부 경찰서 E 파출소 소속 순경 F이 식당에서 퇴거할 것을 요구하자 " 개새끼들아, 내가 뭘 잘못했는데, 이거 놔 "라고 말하며 주먹으로 위 F의 목 부위를 1회, 오른발로 위 F의 허벅지 부위를 1회 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

2. Defendant B

A. Definite Defendant: (a) on November 20, 2016, at around 08:20, the victim F, who was a policeman belonging to the Sungdong Police Station E box in the Modong Police Station, sent out after receiving a report on the disturbance of his/her cryp on the same restaurant as that indicated in paragraph 1; and (b) on the part of the victim, the victim F, who was a policeman belonging to the said restaurant, wishes to kill the victim in order to take on-site photographs; (c) whether the said restaurant proprietor, who entered the said restaurant, would have “

Does fe feas no longer than feas

"Publicly insulting the victim by speaking as a large interest."

B. On November 20, 2016, around 08:25, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, and around November 20, 2016, at around 08:25, the Defendant: (a) arrested A as a current offender of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties; and (b) assaulted F on one hand a part of F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant A who choose a fine: Defendant B who choose a fine: Article 311 of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interfering with the performance of official duties); and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant B), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant A);

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the suspended execution (Defendant B) (the following favorable circumstances).