1. The Defendant’s KRW 17,467,100 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from July 18, 2015 to February 20, 2017.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notification 1) Project name: A public notification of project approval and development project B (2) on January 17, 2013, and D3 project operator of the same public notification on December 4, 2014: Defendant;

B. The subject of expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Gyeongnam-do as of May 29, 2015: The subject of expropriation is Kimhae-si E, Kimhae-si, 638 square meters, and F (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”).

2) The date of commencement of expropriation: The Korea Appraisal Board and the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter “Korea Appraisal Board”) for the compensation for losses: 724,653,90 won in total:

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on December 17, 2016 (1) by the Central Land Tribunal: 2) An appraisal corporation: The central appraisal corporation and the Sam Chang Chang-si appraisal corporation;

D. 1) Compensation for losses as a result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal: A total of 742,121,000 won: G (hereinafter “court appraiser”) appraiser: G (hereinafter “court appraiser”; the result of the appraisal is referred to as “court appraisal”) / [the grounds for recognition] without any dispute; each description of evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Nos. 1 through 1, 5, and 6 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply); the result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal to appraiser G; the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserted that the appraisal by the parties concerned (the appraisal by which an objection is dismissed) contains errors in the comparison of individual factors, and thus, the compensation amount for each land of this case should be increased according to the court appraisal. Thus, the plaintiff asserts that the compensation amount for each land of this case should be increased according to the court appraisal.

On the other hand, the defendant asserts that there was no error in the appraisal of expropriation ruling, but the court appraisal did not have an indivisible relationship with H land at Kimhae-si, and that there was an error in the appraisal of a complex.

B. In a case where there were several parcels of land in which appraisal was conducted as a complex in the court appraisal and assessment, and the land is indivisible for the purpose of its use, the entire land as a whole, barring any special circumstance.