1. The Defendant’s KRW 144,796,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from May 20, 2015 to December 23, 2016.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Business name: Public housing project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Defendant on May 26, 2010, No. 2014-614 announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs No. 2010-315, Oct. 14, 2014;

(b) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on March 26, 2015 - Land to be expropriated: It shall be recorded in the list of real estate in the attached Form;

(이하 ‘이 사건 각 토지’라고 하고, 개별 토지는 지번으로 특정하여 ‘ㅇㅇ 토지’라고 한다). - 영업보상 : 원고가 사업인정고시일인 2010. 5. 26. 이후 영업을 개시하였으므로 이에 대해 보상하지 아니함 - 손실보상금 : 3,775,870,400원 - 수용개시일: 2015. 5. 19. - 감정평가법인 : ㈜ 제일감정평가법인, 한국감정원(이하 ‘각 재결감정인’이라 하고, 그 감정결과를 ‘각 재결감정’이라 한다) [인정근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제3호증, 을 제1, 2호증(가지번호 있는 것은 가지번호 포함, 이하 같다)의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Since each of the instant lands is the land provided to the buildings, warehouses, and annexed parking lots for steel wholesale business operated by the Plaintiff, it should be evaluated as a complex. 2) Since the Plaintiff commenced business in each of the instant lands before the public announcement of the project approval, the Defendant should compensate the Plaintiff for business losses incurred by the expropriation of each of the instant lands.

B. The appraisal and assessment of the relevant legal principles regarding the claim for appraisal of a complex shall be conducted separately for each subject matter: Provided, That where multiple parcels of land are indivisible for the purpose of use by forming a group of lands, barring any special circumstance, it is reasonable to investigate the characteristics of the whole parcel of land as one parcel and evaluate the whole at a single price.

In this context, there is an indivisible relationship for the purpose of use.