1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 23,160,200 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 8,376,60 to Plaintiff B; and (c) respectively, from May 14, 2014 to June 1, 2016.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project name: A public notice of project approval and public notice of project name: D public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on December 3, 2009, and E public notice of the same Ministry on November 16, 201: Defendant;

(b) Objects to be expropriated by the Central Land Tribunal on March 20, 2014 (Adjudication of Expropriation 1) : Attached Table 2 in Namyang-si: The date of commencement of expropriation: 802,288,900 won: Plaintiff A: 802,288,900 won; Plaintiff B: 1,034,420,400 won: 4) a new appraisal corporation, future appraisal corporation, 3 appraisal corporation;

C. Plaintiff B: (a) The Central Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “Central Land Expropriation Committee”) made an objection on March 26, 2015, Plaintiff A: (b) KRW 832,625,500 of the compensation for losses for the land indicated in the attached Table; (c) the compensation for losses for each land listed in the attached Table (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) shall be increased to KRW 1,047,51,300: (a) the appraisal corporation: the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation, and the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation (based on recognition); (b) there is no dispute; (c) evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number;

each entry, entry in Eul's evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Details of appraisal by this court;

A. The Plaintiff A appraiser F of this Court calculated the compensation amount of KRW 855,785,700 for the Plaintiff’s land.

B. Plaintiff B (1) The current status of each of the instant lands in question, which were adjacent to each other at the time of the adjudication of expropriation, was used as a plastic house site for farming at the time of the adjudication of expropriation. (2) The appraisal by this court was not considered as an indivisible relationship for each of the instant lands, but the appraisal by this court appraiser F was assessed as KRW 1,05,887,90 in total, based on the individual appraisal by each of the instant lands. (2) The appraisal by this court, as a result of the supplementary appraisal by this court, the Plaintiff B was an indivisible relationship for each of the instant lands, which were adjacent to each of the instant lands, as seen earlier.