1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs the amount of money stated in the attached Table [Attachment] and each of them from April 16, 2016.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and publication - Project name: J urban environment rearrangement project: K published in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 26, 2012 - Project implementer: Defendant;

B. Decision on expropriation made on February 26, 2016 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Metropolitan City: Each land listed in the separate list of land owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each land of this case”), and “Seoul Mapo-gu Ldong” and “Seoul Mapo-gu Mdong” are “Mdong”): The starting date of expropriation: N andO stock company on April 15, 2016.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on objection on December 22, 2016 - Compensation for losses: As shown in the attached Table [Attachment] stating the amount of compensation for objection.

- An appraisal corporation: Each entry in P and Q (hereinafter referred to as “the result of the appraisal of the above appraisal”) [based on the ground of recognition], Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 14, Eul evidence No. 1 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The defendant should pay to the plaintiffs the difference between the amount of compensation by the court's appraisal, which is the legitimate compensation for each of the lands of this case, and compensation for delay of the difference between the amount of compensation by the court's appraisal and the amount of compensation by the court's appraisal, and compensation for delay of the application for adjudication, additional dues and compensation for delay of the difference between the amount of compensation by the court

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. The result of the appraisal conducted by this court by requesting a certified public appraiser S who belongs to R Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “court appraisal”) was selected as a comparative standard for each of the instant lands and the actual conditions of use, and the reference land whose surrounding environment is identical or similar to that of the former as a comparative standard, the appraisal value as of the date of the adjudication on expropriation of each of the instant lands was calculated through the revision of the point, comparison of regional factors, comparison of individual factors, and other correction of factors, and the main contents