logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.10.02 2018구합62738
손실보상금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay the corresponding money to the plaintiff A, B, C, D, E, F, and G as stated in the attached Table 1 claim amount.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and announcement 1) Project approval: J2) Public announcement of project implementation: K K (24 December 24, 2015) public announcement of G-si and L (15 January 25, 2017) public announcement of G-si: Defendant;

B. Land to be expropriated by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on February 27, 2017: Each land indicated in the column for the object to be expropriated in attached Table 1 (hereinafter “each land of this case”).

(2) The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on April 13, 2017: a light-day appraisal corporation, a third-party appraisal corporation, and a third-party appraisal corporation.

(c) Compensation for losses by the Central Land Tribunal on February 22, 2018: Each amount indicated in the column for ruling on an objection to attached Table 1 2): An appraisal corporation: the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation; the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation; the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation (based on recognition); the facts that there is no dispute; Gap's evidence 1 through 4 (including paper numbers); and Eul's evidence 1 through 4; and the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Since the amount of compensation determined by the ruling on the objection of this case does not reach the market price, the defendant is obligated to pay the difference with the reasonable compensation to the plaintiffs.

B. The facts of recognition 1) Each of the instant lands is land located in the Marith of the wife population, which is located in the Grith of Young-si, and is mixed with detached houses, factories and warehouses, education and research facilities, farmland, forests, forests, forests, etc. around the land, and the overall traffic situation in the vicinity of the N in the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, and the specific-use area under the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and the Enforcement Decree thereof is indicated in the column in the table in the table in the table in the table in the table in the table in the table in the table in the table in the attached Table 2.2) The appraisal and the court appraisal are all of the instant lands located in the vicinity of each of the instant lands and the specific-use area is the same, and the land is calculated through the comparison of each land in the table

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, evidence pre-satisfy and appraisal result by appraiserO

C. The ruling of objection and the court appraisal are made.

arrow