1. The Defendant has to the Plaintiffs from February 12, 2016 as to each of the money stated in the separate sheet “Difference” column and each of the said money.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business Name (M) - Public notice: N on January 8, 2015, N on September 22, 2015, O on September 22, 2015, and P on November 17, 2015 - Defendant:

(b) The ruling of expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Gyeonggi-do on December 28, 2015 - Land or obstacles listed in the separate sheet - The starting date of expropriation: The compensation amount on February 11, 2016 - The term “compensation amount” listed in the separate sheet is as indicated.

- An appraisal corporation: a national appraisal corporation and Samsung Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”)

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on December 22, 2016 - Contents of the ruling: The same shall apply to the statement in the “compensation amount for objection” as indicated in the attached Table.

- An appraisal corporation: a Sejong-type appraisal corporation and a Pacific appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal of objection”).

D. Results of appraiser Q’s market appraisal - Contents of appraisal: as indicated in the “amount of compensation for the court’s appraisal” as indicated in the attached list.

hereinafter referred to as "court appraisal"

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including Serial number, each entry of Eul evidence 1 to 4, the market price appraisal result of appraiser Q Q, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The appraisal of expropriation and the appraisal of the appraisal of the plaintiffs' land or obstacles owned by the plaintiffs without reflecting the market price and it is unfair to evaluate it low. Thus, the defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiffs the amount corresponding to the difference between the appraised value of the plaintiffs' land or obstacles according to the result of the court appraisal and the amount of compensation for losses as stipulated in the appraisal, and the amount of compensation for losses as stated in the attached list "Difference" and each of the above amounts.

B. In the lawsuit on the increase or decrease of the amount of compensation for expropriation, both the result of the adjudication and appraisal and the result of the court appraisal are not unlawful in the evaluation methods, and the contents of the evaluation.