beta
Text
1. Defendant B Co., Ltd. shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 7,00,000 as well as its annual interest from September 29, 2016 to August 17, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The relevant Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a broadcasting business entity established for the purpose of broadcasting business and cultural service business, and is engaged in the production, compilation, and broadcasting of “D”, which is a current culture program. The Plaintiff was living at the time of I, but died on December 27, 2016, before the instant lawsuit was filed.
Defendant C is the Trinam of the network H and is a fluort, and Defendant C is a person who has contributed to the “J” Part I broadcasted by Defendant B, “D” G. (hereinafter “instant broadcast”).
B. 1) The Plaintiff and Defendant C’s private village of the instant broadcast 1) reported to the “D” production team, which is the current cultural program for Defendant B’s current events, that “Defendant C took gift of the network H, which was gathered from the network L, which was put on July 19, 2006, and the land and the second floor building on the land of the Busan Young-gu M, Busan (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) after the lapse of 10 years from the extinctive prescription period of the right to claim the return of the forced inheritance portion of other siblingss, which was the period for other siblings’s forced hospitalization H into the hospital, and that Defendant B’s “D” production team after the aforementioned notification was made from September 8, 2016 to the “D” production team.
9. From 13. A total of six days up to 13. The Defendant C and his/her spouse, the Plaintiff and his/her spouse, N, a woman of the network H, and son and sonO were covered by an interview. The inside form of the instant real estate in which the network H resided, the hospitalization room of the convalescent hospital hospitalized, etc. were taken.
3) Defendant B, as a “D” G association, sent the instant broadcast under the title “J”. C) The Plaintiff applied for the conciliation of the content that the Plaintiff requested Defendant B to the Press Arbitration Commission on November 16, 2016 to report the correction of the instant broadcast, but the said commission is impossible to reach an agreement between the parties on December 16, 2016.