1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants with respect to Plaintiff B is revoked, and that part constitutes the revoked part.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 3, 199, the deceased I (hereinafter “the deceased”) owned each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) and owned part of the real estate in the order of order when he complied with, on December 3, 199, the Defendant G donated each of the instant real estate (i) to the Defendant G, and (ii) the instant real estate (i) on December 4, 199, and (iii) on December 4, 199, the title transfer registration was completed in the Defendants’ future on December 23, 199.

B. On November 21, 2012, the Deceased died, and as a bereaved family member, the Defendants were the Plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, and son, who were married with the Plaintiff at the first instance court, the wife of the deceased.

다. 피고 H는 2011. 9. 19. J에게 이 사건 제⑪부동산을 1억 6,440만 원에 매도하고 2011. 10. 24. 소유권이전등기를 마쳐주었다.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 19 (if there is an additional number, including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination

가. 피고들의 유류분 반환의무 망인이 생전에 피고 G에게 이 사건 제① 내지 ⑦부동산을, 피고 H에게 이 사건 제⑧ 내지 ⑪부동산을 각각 증여하고 2012. 11. 21. 사망한 사실, 피고 H가 이 사건 제⑪부동산을 대금 1억 6,440만 원에 매도하고 소유권이전등기를 마쳐준 사실은 앞에서 인정한 바와 같으므로, 피고들은 특별한 사정이 없는 한 원고들에게 아래 표 기재와 같은 유류분 비율에 따라 이 사건 제① 내지 ⑩부동산에 관하여는 원물반환의 방법으로, 이 사건 제⑪부동산의 매각대금에 관하여는 가액반환의 방법으로 유류분을 반환할 의무가 있다.

A 3/17 3/34 Plaintiff B 2/17 2/34 Plaintiff C2/17 2/34 Plaintiff C 2/17 2/34 Plaintiff D 2/17 2/17 2/34 Plaintiff E 2/17 2/17 2/34 Plaintiff F 2/17 2/34

B. Determination 1 on the Defendants’ defenses by the Defendants was made in 2013, where three months have elapsed since the Deceased died at the latest.