logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원공주지원 2019.09.19 2019가단20145
유류분반환
Text

1. For the plaintiffs:

A. Defendant D is indicated in the separate sheet of the Plaintiffs’ share among the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 of the attached Table 1.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The deceased F (hereinafter “the deceased”) owned each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

B. On April 12, 2016, the Deceased donated each of the real estate listed in attached Tables 1 and 2 to Defendant D, and the real estate listed in attached Tables 1 and 1 List 3 to Defendant E, respectively, and completed each registration of ownership transfer to the Defendants on April 22, 2016.

C. On July 26, 2018, the deceased died. The deceased’s heir was identified as G, children H and Defendants, and Plaintiff B and their children, who were their children, and the deceased’s inheritance shares are 6/77, Plaintiff B and C, respectively.

The Plaintiffs filed a claim against the Defendants for the return of legal reserve of inheritance concerning each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 by serving a duplicate of the complaint of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the Defendants are obligated to return the legal reserve for each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 to the Plaintiffs, and Defendant D is obligated to implement each procedure for ownership transfer registration for each share listed in the separate sheet No. 2, which is the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case by shares listed in the separate sheet No. 2, the Plaintiffs’ legal reserve for each share listed in the separate sheet No. 1, No. 2019, Jan. 30, 2019, among the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, No. 3, the Plaintiffs’ legal reserve for each share listed in the separate sheet No. 2, which is the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case.

The defendants asserted that it is reasonable to return the legal reserve at the price of the method of return of the legal reserve, but if the person with the right to the legal reserve claims the return of the legal reserve through the method of return of the legal reserve, and if it is possible to return the legal reserve, the court shall order the return of the legal reserve according to the method requested by the person with the right to the legal reserve,

arrow