logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2015.08.20 2014가합1644 (1)
유류분반환
Text

1. Plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F:

A. Defendant G shall share 2/34 of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 to 7.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 3, 199, the deceased I (hereinafter “the deceased”) owned each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) and owned part of the real estate in the order of order when he complied with, on December 3, 199, the Defendant G donated each of the instant real estate (i) to the Defendant G, and (ii) the instant real estate (i) on December 4, 199, and (iii) on December 4, 199, the title transfer registration was completed in the Defendants’ future on December 23, 199.

B. On November 21, 2012, the Deceased died, and as a bereaved family member, the Defendants were the Defendants, both Plaintiff B, C, D, E, F, and A, who were married to the Plaintiff’s wife, as his wife.

C. Meanwhile, on June 10, 2013, after the death of the deceased, Defendant G created a collateral of KRW 240 million with respect to the instant property (i.e., the National Bank of Korea), (ii), (iii), and (5) the maximum debt amount of KRW 200,000,000 to the National Bank of Korea.

피고 H는 2011. 9. 19. J에게 이 사건 제⑪부동산을 1억 6,440만 원에 매도하고 2011. 10. 24. 소유권이전등기를 마쳐주었다.

【Fact-finding without dispute over the ground for recognition】 Each entry in Gap evidence 1 through 19 (including each number in the case of additional number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Defendants asserted that this part of the lawsuit against the Plaintiff A was unlawful, since the Plaintiff did not delegate the instant litigation to the Plaintiff’s attorney, the Defendants asserted that this part of the lawsuit is unlawful.

In full view of the overall purport of pleadings, including reference materials, etc. submitted by the plaintiffs' attorney at this court on August 12, 2015, the plaintiff A may recognize the fact that the plaintiff A has delegated the plaintiffs' attorney's attorney's right of attorney to the plaintiff's attorney at this court, and thus, the prior defense on the merits cannot be accepted.

3. Judgment on the merits

A. The Defendants shall return their respective legal reserve of inheritance.

arrow