logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2018.08.08 2018고단320
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) from “D” operated by the Victim C (FFE 50) located in “D”; (b) on February 25, 2018, the Defendant: (c) was under the influence of alcohol and was called on the seat of each of the parties and called on a seat; (d) was sent to the house by the injured party.

D) When hearing the horses, the victim’s face was flicked one time with a lush hand, walked the victim’s flick, walked several times due to the lush, and flicked the victim’s head and flicked the victim’s head, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as a rash, which has no room in the open two weeks of treatment.

3. On February 25, 2018, from around 17:04 to December 17:12 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by abusing the business owners and employees at the places described in paragraph 1. from around 17:04 to around 17:12 of the same day, as described in paragraphs 1. to 2., and 3., “Chewing years and the same year”, and passing a noise around the above restaurant entrance, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

4. On February 25, 2018, around 17:12, around 17:12, the Defendant, who obstructed the performance of official duties, committed assault, such as, around the restaurant entrance as indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant, who was demanded from F to speak personal information by a police officer belonging to the Kunju Police Station E District, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112, saying, “I am 112 am, I am knife, I am knife, I am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraph (C) to field and assault photographs, each investigation report, victim C’s assault photographs, ctv images to take and photographics and diagnosis reports submitted by the victim C;

1. Article 257 (1), Article 314 (1), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The Criminal Act, the suspension of execution;

arrow