A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 17, 2017, at a “D” restaurant operated by the victim C on the 1st floor in Sinpo City B around 00:49 on August 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol, she has a large amount of mar, mar, and mar, to the employees E of the said restaurant; and (b) food and food and drink.

“A public bath,” etc., and “The food of this restaurant was packed in plastic bags outside the plastic bags and brought to China for other customers who are eating at that place.”

"A damaged person, such as a large sound, refers to a group of times in which the damaged person becomes a restaurant."

Although it was requested, it was difficult to avoid disturbance continuously until 02:28 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On August 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 02:50 on August 17, 2017, at around the entrance of the “D” restaurant; (b) G public officials of the police police box affiliated with the 112 military police box called up after receiving the 112 report, attempted to arrest the Defendant as the current offender on suspicion of interference with the duties; and (c) whether the Defendant was arrested.

“The loss of the police officer was ppuri and the body fighting was exceeded together on the floor.

The police officer continued to control the defendant and kneee, etc. of the police officer in charge of the defect that is likely to wear the flaps.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report processing and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on recording CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing duties), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and the order of community service [the sentencing guidelines shall be recommended.]