logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.20 2015가합581006
퇴직금
Text

1. The defendant stated in the "retirement Allowance" sheet in the annexed amount calculation sheet to the plaintiffs as well as each of them.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Defendant is a company that primarily performs debt collection and credit investigation business with permission from the Financial Services Commission in accordance with the Use and Protection of Credit Information Act. The Plaintiffs are the respective delegation contracts between the Defendant and the Defendant (hereinafter “instant delegation contracts”).

(1) The term “A” in the annexed retirement allowance calculation table means that “A” has entered into a contract with “A” and retired from office at the end of each service period. Article 2 (2) (hereinafter “B”) provides that “A” shall be responsible for recovery of claims delegated by “A” (hereinafter “Defendant”) and all related affairs. Article 3 (3) (1) is not in an employment relationship with “B” as provided for in the Labor Standards Act, and does not apply to “A” regular employees. (2) Pursuant to the foregoing paragraph, “B” shall faithfully pay social insurance premiums, etc. (National Pension and Health Insurance, etc.). (1) “B” shall comply with relevant Acts and subordinate statutes in performing its duties provided for in Article 2, and shall not be in good faith. ② “B” shall not be delegated to “A” in the name of “A” and “B” in the name of “B” and “B” in the name of “B” and “B” in the name of “B” and “B” in the name of “B”.

arrow