logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.01.14 2014나2013
퇴직금
Text

1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

Basic Facts

(2) On January 2, 2009, the Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant and retired on April 30, 201, while taking charge of credit management and collection. The Plaintiff retired on January 30, 201, with the permission of the Financial Services Commission in accordance with the Credit Information Use and Protection Act.

3) The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s major contents of the delegation contract written on December 27, 2010 are as follows. Article 2(B) of the Plaintiff and the Defendant shall perform the recovery of claims delegated by the Defendant and all related affairs under their responsibility. Article 3(A)(1) of the Act is not in an employment relationship provided for in the Labor Standards Act with the Party A, and the rules of employment and all related provisions applicable to the regular workers of Party A are not applicable. (2) In accordance with the relationship under the preceding paragraph, Party B shall pay social insurance premiums (national pension, health insurance, etc.) in good faith. (1) Article 5 (Method of Performance) (1) of the Act provides that “A shall comply with relevant Acts and subordinate statutes and faithfully perform the handling of the affairs provided for in Article 2.” ② “B” shall not, under the name of the Party A, engage in the act of collecting claims under its own authority, including consultation with the relevant obligor, demand for repayment, investigation of property and location of the relevant person and his/her incidental affairs to Party A’s name.

arrow