logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.22 2019가단5005959
퇴직금 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 6,185,492 for Plaintiff A and its related costs from February 16, 2018, and KRW 33,473,670 for Plaintiff B and its related costs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Defendant is a company primarily engaged in debt collection and credit investigation business with permission from the Financial Services Commission in accordance with the Act on the Use and Protection of Credit Information. The Plaintiffs are each delegation contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant delegation contract”).

(4) From January 7, 2014 to January 31, 2018, Plaintiff A entered into a contract with Plaintiff B (four years 25); Plaintiff B from January 5, 2006 to July 31, 2018 (two years 208); Plaintiff C, from October 10, 2014 to November 30, 2018 (four years 52); Plaintiff D, under the name of the debtor, worked for respective debt collection authorities under the name of Party A (three years 289); and (2) the duty to verify and investigate the status of Party B’s property performance under the name of Party A (which is delegated by the “Defendant”); and (3) the duty to verify the status of Party B’s insurance premium performance under the name of Party A (which is not related to Party A); and (2) the duty to verify and investigate the status of Party B’s new insurance premium performance under the Labor Standards Act, shall not be applied to Party A’s obligations related to Party B’s employment.

arrow