beta
Text
1. All appeals as to the principal lawsuit and counterclaims by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the counterclaim claims extended in the trial are dismissed.
Reasons
1. The parties' assertion
A. The Plaintiff, as a dentist, treated the Defendant from March 21, 2002 to August 5, 201, while operating the Dental in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul.
From June 2008, the Defendant began to claim from around June 2008 that the Plaintiff’s medical malpractice on the second half-gu book (No. 35; hereinafter referred to as “child”) on the left-hand side of the Defendant, caused the Defendant’s ging, etc., and thereafter, the Defendant asserted that all of the Plaintiff’s medical malpractices, such as the attached list, had incurred damages, and accordingly, the Defendant has damaged or interfered with the Plaintiff’s honor or duties, and demanded compensation for damages of several million won.
However, since there is no negligence of the plaintiff on the treatment act stated in the attached list, there is no liability for damages against the defendant, the judgment like the purport of the claim is sought.
B. Defendant 1) The Plaintiff, after the treatment of the probationary treatment of an infant No. 35 (m. 35) and the Defendant is likely to suffer from the crypology. As such, the Plaintiff failed to fulfill the obligation to explain cautions, such as singing a solid food, and a certificate of merger, and caused the Plaintiff to cut off the cryp of No. 35 due to negligence delay in the cryp treatment after the completion of the probationary treatment. 2) On December 18, 2006, the Plaintiff: (a) laid the Defendant’s cryp (No. 36, No. 37, No. 37, No. 37; hereinafter “S. 36, No. 37”); and (b) manufactured the crypryp of a cryp on April 3, 2007.
3) On November 29, 2005, the Plaintiff is the second Go-gu on the left-hand side of the Defendant's bad faith (25 No. 25; hereinafter referred to as "I-young").
Since the treatment for commuting treatment for A, until August 30, 201, the treatment for commuting treatment, the production of relic and the attachment of relic has been performed, and in the process, No. 25.