1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,034,608 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from April 12, 2014 to December 12, 2019.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a dentist to whom the Cental Hospital located in Daejeon Seo-gu (hereinafter “Cental Hospital”) belongs to the instant hospital.

B. On March 22, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) applied to the instant hospital for the treatment of fluoration and fluoration at the bottom of the left-hand side; (b) provided consultation with the relevant hospital; and (c) provided first, for the treatment of fluoral treatment of fluoral and fluoral treatment at the bottom of the right-hand upper right-hand upper part; and (d) received fluoral treatment.

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff was subject to the removal of the part of the secte of the 1st Daegu (hereinafter “instant pathy”) of the lower right to the right to the right to the lower end of April 12, 2014, and was under the neute treatment, between April 19, 2014 and July 4, 2014. The Plaintiff was under the neute treatment and the neute treatment with respect to the instant Mean, and was under the neute treatment several times from that date to April 8, 2016.

On the other hand, the dental devices used by the Defendant while treating neutic treatment were left behind. D.

The Plaintiff, even after April 8, 2016, received treatment for the instant infant from other dentists affiliated with the instant hospital, on July 18, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-1 through 2-2, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, video, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Establishment of liability for damages;

A. The following circumstances, which were revealed by comprehensively taking account of the evidence revealed prior to the existence of negligence in the process, the images of Gap 10-1 through 10-7, the results of each request for the examination of medical records to the head of the association of this hospital, and the overall purport of the pleadings, i.e., the plaintiff, who first received psychotropic treatment from the defendant with respect to the child of this case from around March 2014, when he first received psychotropic treatment (refence treatment), but there was no dental disease to the extent that the path of the path of this case, and ii) as to the path of this case.