beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. At around 01:00 on October 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) went to the office of the “KB Damage Insurance E-agency” operated by the victim D in Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) intruded into the said office through the opened window; and (c) removed the computers at the location, the market price of the victim, which is the victim’s possession of the removed computers, with three CPU chip, RAM card three; and (d) one 100,000 won on the books of the said office, and stolen them.
2. On October 13, 2016, around 01:00, the Defendant infringed on the above office through the open window, and stolen three CPU chips, a market price, the victim’s market price, which was the victim’s possession, removed and removed a computer, and three CPU chips, which was operated by the victim D.
3. On October 31, 2016, around 01:00, the Defendant: (a) infringed on the said office through open windows; and (b) placed one CPU chip and a RAM card on the market price, which is the victim’s market price, removed and removed a computer at that place; and (c) stolen it.
Summary of Evidence
1. The written statement of the Defendant 1.G of the police statement 1.D (victims) 1. On-site identification reports, 1. electronic appraisal records, 1. photographic explanation (the contents of the seizure), photographic explanation (the contents of the seizure), photographic explanation (the contents of the seizure), each damaged site, etc., and the application of the law governing the seized objects.
1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;
1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes is that the defendant committed the crime of this case even though he had been prior to the suspended sentence due to the same larceny, and even during the suspended sentence period, he committed the crime of this case. The defendant led to confession and reflect the crime of this case, and that some victims have agreed to do so.