A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 18, 2018, the injured defendant suffered injury from the E main points where the victim D (Woo, 47 years old) works in C at a macroscam on September 18, 2018, and the police officers belonging to the F District of the Gyeongnam Police Station F District reported that the defendant was at the time of the victim, upon receipt of a report 112 that the defendant was at the time of the victim, the victim was dispatched to the above place, and the victim was sleeped once by hand, and the victim was sleeped twice by walking the part of the victim at approximately 14 days, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as sleep and sleeping.

2. From around 02:45 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a current offender for the facts constituting a crime listed in paragraph 1 from a police officer, a police officer belonging to the said patrol group, and was on board the back seat of the patrol group; (b) on the same day, the Defendant damaged the goods used by the auxiliary public office to have approximately KRW 3.3,00 won of the repair cost by walking around 10 on the back seat of the patrol group, which is a public object building.

3. Interference with performing public duties;

A. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties to patrolmen I on the same day at the F District of the Gyeongnam Police Station in the Gyeongnam Police Station in the Gyeongnam-siJ at 02:50 on the same day, and the Defendant will die in knife upon the completion of the case.

The police box is dwarf or not

“Absently, she assaulted a police officer I’s sagn part of I’s sagn part of I on one occasion of walking.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of the above police officer's crime.

B. Whether the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties of H on the same day to the police officer who prepared an investigation document against the Defendant at the 03:20 on the same day, while serving in the earth, “I continue to keep the Defendant,” and

60 6

The Defendant spits or spits the above H as soon as possible with the view that it is called 'Woo L'. Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the police officers' legitimate execution of their duties in relation to global situation service.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I, K, and H;

1. Each photograph; 1.2