logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.08.28 2014고합95
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On August 29, 2001, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Seoul District Court on April 11, 2003, and two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the former District Court on April 11, 2003. On January 13, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the former District Court on

[Judgment of the court below]

1. Around April 3, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) cited one 100,000 won of the market price owned by the victim who was on the front door of the lecture room in order to have the victim returned home to the private teaching institutes of the victim, and stolen it by taking advantage of the cresh of the lecture room, one 1,000,000 won of the market price owned by the victim and one 1,000,000 won of the national card, one agricultural credit card, and one NAC Cash Card.

From around that time to April 25, 2014, the Defendant attempted to steals or steals another’s property worth approximately KRW 20,245,000 in total, as indicated in the attached list (1) from around 126 times to around 20,00.

2. On April 3, 2013, the Defendant, who violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, presented the “EV” operated by the EU of the victims of ETS, as if he was the R, and purchased a part of the Abreh half of the Abreh half, as described in paragraph (1).

However, in fact, since the national card presented by the defendant was a stolen R credit card, there was no intention or ability to pay the price to the defendant.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received one half of 2.80,000 won at the market price from the victim, and signed the above R in the signature column, issued it to the victim, and used the stolen credit card.

The defendant.

arrow