logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.06.09 2015고합30
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Seized crowdfunding 1 (No. 2) and verification scam.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 2, 1978, the defendant was sentenced to protective custody in the Seoul Eastern District Court for habitual larceny for a short term of 8 months, 3 years in the same court on June 21, 1979, 3 years in the same court on July 2, 1981, 7 years in the Seoul High Court for a short term of 2 years in the imprisonment for special larceny for a short term of 3 years, 7 years in the imprisonment for a long term of 3 years in the Seoul High Court for habitual special larceny for 3 years, 1 year and 6 months in the Seoul High Court for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny). On April 25, 1995, the defendant was sentenced to protective custody in 1 year and 1 year and 6 months in the Seoul High Court for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes for the Government Branch on January 22, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On September 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of objects worth KRW 18,594,000 in total five times habitually from around that time to January 12, 205, including the following: (b) around 13:10 on September 19, 2014, the Defendant entered the victim D's house 201 Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, with a fenced by more than 70,00,000 won; and (c) subsequently, the Defendant stolen objects worth KRW 18,594,00,000 in total on five occasions during the period from that time to January 21, 2015.

2. On December 22, 2014, the Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act and the Defendant purchased 1 punishment from the “G Articles 299,000, the market price of the “G Articles 299,000,” which is equivalent to 29,000, from the “G Articles 29,000,” the Defendant signed the sales slip and received the said articles from the victim as if he had due authority.

Accordingly, the defendant used a stolen debit card and received property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H, I, and J;

1. D. D.

arrow