1. The part against Plaintiff G in the judgment of the first instance is revoked.

2. The defendant against the plaintiff G:

(a) 96 square meters prior to Pyeongtaek-si AA.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as follows, except for the addition or replacement as follows, and therefore, it is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance. However, since the litigation between the plaintiffs and the co-defendants is terminated in accordance with the ruling of recommending reconciliation made in the court of first instance and the defendant remains in Pyeongtaek-si, each of the lawsuits between W, X,Y, and Z that was the co-defendants and the defendant remains in common, the part indicated as “Defendant Pyeongtaek-si” in the judgment of the court of first instance cited as “the defendant” shall be deemed to be “the defendant,” and the name shall be appropriately cited in the manner of deletion of the parts indicated as “the co-defendant of the court of first instance”

In addition, the attached Form 1 shall be added to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of the first instance that cited the "attached Form" in accordance with the indication of the attached Form attached thereto.

In all parts cited below, the above mentioned parts shall be made.

It shall be quoted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

After the 15th 15th th 15th th th th 15th th th th th 15th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th, “

The 13th end of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "Advered "," and the P, which was a co-Plaintiff of the first instance, died on June 18, 2015, and the plaintiff S taken over the deceased following the procedure of consultation on the division of inherited property."

The "PS" of the 13th 17th 17th 13th court rulings of the first instance court shall be applied to "The Network PPlaintiff S.".

2. Summary of the plaintiffs' assertion

A. The registration of ownership transfer was completed with respect to each of the lands of this case, which are the primary cause of the claim for the registration of ownership transfer, by sharing of the plaintiffs and the defendant, but the plaintiffs and the defendant actually own each of the lands of this case.