(영문) 대구고등법원 2018.11.22 2018나22597

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구고등법원 2018.11.22 2018나22597

손해배상(기)

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs and the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation in this judgment are as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following Paragraph 2 (Provided, That the part against joint defendant E of the court of first instance, except for the part against joint defendant E of the court of first instance, the part "Defendant E" of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance is "joint defendant E of the court of first instance") and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Article 13 of the 7th sentence of the first instance court's judgment " alone is written with evidence Nos. 6 and 13 of the A," of the 13th sentence of the 7th instance court's decision, "All evidence submitted by the plaintiffs to this court, including the written evidence No. 6 and 13 of the A, and the circumstances surrounding the assertion

B. Article 14 of the first instance court’s decision No. 9 provides that “In light of the following facts or circumstances, the part “In light of the following facts or circumstances,” of the first instance court’s decision, the evidence submitted by the Defendants, such as the witness I, and the testimony of this court by the witness I, shall be considered in all of the evidence submitted by the Defendants to this court.”

(c)the following shall be added between conduct 4 and 5 of the decision of the first instance.

In addition, in cases where an employee committed an intentional act against another person, the employer is liable on the ground that the employee’s act is related to the external and objective act of performing his/her duties in a case where the employee’s act was conducted in the course of performing all or part of his/her duties or the motive of the harmful act is related to his/her duties (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 9Da47297, Feb. 11, 2000; 2008Da89712, Feb. 26, 2009). On the other hand, other civil cases or civil cases in civil litigation.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2017.04.13 2016나2056074

-서울고등법원 2017.02.09 2016나556

-서울고등법원 2016.04.07 2015나2057285

-서울고등법원 2018.01.25 2017나2061455

-서울고등법원 2017.01.12 2016나2050960