The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and B, around 04:00 on February 3, 2016, when drinking together at the “D’s singing shop” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was viewed as an issue of pre-payment of the drinking value due to the extension of time between the victim E and the head of the above business establishment, and the Defendant and B, the Defendant and B, who have expressed a great voice to the victim “I am, I have yet to be able to do so, I have to do so, and the Defendant continued to talk with the victim, and interfered with the victim’s main business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as intending to display the victim’s bath, and drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with B to interfere with the victim's main business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (the fact that the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant as the defendant agreed with the injured party only by the agreement with the injured party, and that the defendant is divided into his mistake, and the defendant will not commit such a crime in the future.

(1) The court shall take into account the fact that there is no previous conviction, and there is no previous conviction, and there is only one previous conviction, and there is no previous conviction.