The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the summary of the grounds for appeal did not sell tobacco to juvenile E in the “Dus” operated by the defendant, the court below found the facts charged and found the defendant guilty, there is an error of law by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below, based on the evidence duly adopted and examined, i.e., ① Juvenile E (14 years of age, South) reported on January 12, 2013 to the police that “I am mincated Ha,” and ② on the same day, E purchased tobacco at the police around January 12, 2013 at H middle school, which is the Dricker E going to the police, around 09:30, there was no statement from the court below that I am 13 days of purchase of tobacco, and that I am son stated that I am son's tobacco was sold. The Defendant stated that I am 13 days of the investigation record, which I am am son, and that I am am son's tobacco was sold. The Defendant stated to the court below that I am am 13 days of the statement that I am son's tobacco was sold.”

At first, the father(F) has shown the son(E) eye.

In order to provide education, we can see the tool or excellent quality.

In full view of the facts stated, the Defendant sold tobacco with the recognition that E is a juvenile.