Incheon District Court 2010Guu136 ( November 04, 2010)

early 209 Heavy2610 ( December 31, 2009)

shall be the representative in the name of the title.

(As with the judgment of the first instance court), the plaintiff is registered as a representative director but has been registered as a representative director and has received a monthly wage, and the actual operator is distributed shares to avoid responsibility as an oligopolistic stockholder, and thus falls under the representative under the name of the representative.

2010Nu4205 Global income and revocation of disposition

XX

O Head of tax office

Incheon District Court Decision 2010Guhap1136 Decided November 4, 2010

June 28, 2011

August 23, 2011

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s disposition of imposition of global income tax of KRW 163,787,660 against the Plaintiff on December 2, 2008 shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it can be accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.