logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.06.02 2016고단403
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 8, 2016, 02:20, the Defendant reported that the Defendant assaulted the taxi article in front of the police box of the Jindo Police Station C, which was in front of the police box of the Jindo Police Station C, which was in front of the police box in front of the police box of the Jindo Police Station C, was in front of the police box in front of the police box, and used the Defendant to pay for the taxi expenses and return home, and the police box of the C police box called the Defendant “sing, smoking, and drinking..............., the Defendant saw the Defendant’s sound that the Defendant “........., the police box of the police box of the C police box called the Defendant “.........”

“In doing so, the spits or spits spits, etc. on the above E, which interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, D, or E;

1. Application of statutes on site and victim photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The punishment imposed under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution does not be mitigated as the defendant interfered with the execution of official duties by exercising violence against police officers who are drunk and performing legitimate official duties at night: Provided, That the execution of the sentence shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that the defendant was not guilty, and

b. Determination of punishment as ordered by comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, family environment, motive and circumstance of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of

arrow