A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the police officer affiliated with the Daegu Southern-gu Police Station D police station D police box, who was called up after receiving a report from 112, fright to a taxi engineer in front of Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, upon receiving a report from 07:00 on January 6, 2018, paid the taxi expenses to the Defendant and fright to return home, “I am out, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flicked, flick, flick, flicked, flick.

In doing so, “A police officer E’s face is taken by drinking, and a police officer’s face was used by a winger, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning public peace and order maintenance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (reporting G or hearing of witness statements);

1. The reason for sentencing a sentence of imprisonment, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the selected criminal law, and Article 136(1) of the selected criminal law on October 26, 2017 is that the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for 4 months due to a violation of road traffic law (unlicensed driving) at the Daegu District Court on November 26, 2017. The above judgment became final and conclusive on November 3, 2017, and is currently under suspended sentence, the defendant committed an act without any particular reason, under the influence of alcohol, the defendant committed an act of assaulting a police officer without any particular reason, two criminal offenses committed by the defendant due to interference with the performance of the same kind of official duties, and all criminal offenses committed by the defendant on two occasions, and

The fact that the defendant is against the defendant and that it seems that the damage of the damaged police officer is minor is considered in favor of the defendant.

In addition, the circumstances prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the age, sex, etc. of the defendant, shall be determined as per the order.