logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.06.16 2016고단799
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 4, 2016, the Defendant reported from the 101 suspender of the former building B, the Changwon-si, the Changwon-si, the 19:25 on March 4, 2016, that the Defendant forced the Defendant to leave his her blicked, and received a report from the 101 suspender of the building B, and called the Defendant, the Defendant “I” to the assistant D and E who belongs to the police box of the Jinhae Police Station C

At present, 200, 200, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2000, 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate performance of official duties on 112 reported handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D, E, F, and G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The execution of a sentence under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is to be suspended considering the following: (a) the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, as he/she interfered with the performance of official duties by exercising abusive and violence against police officers in the course of performing his/her legitimate official duties; (b) but, in the course of giving a blicker’s care, he/she did not seem to have committed any contingent crime by interesting, preventing him/her from committing any crime;

b. Determination of punishment as ordered by comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, family environment, motive and circumstance of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of

arrow