Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 22:20 on September 20, 2014, Defendant B, upon receiving a report on the assault case 112, the Defendant recommended the Defendant to return home while demanding the police officer F belonging to the 112 E district unit of the Mona Police Station in the Hayangan Police Station E district called “Is to see why Is, Is, Is, Iss, Is, Is, Iss, Is, Is, Iss, Is, Iss, Iss, Iss, Iss, Iss, Is, and ams, Iss, Is, Is, and ams, Iss, Is, and am swes, Is, and interferes with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties regarding F’s 112 reporting duties.

2. Defendant A interfered with F’s performance of official duties at the same time, at the same place, and at the same time and place, the police officer G belonging to the same police station intended to arrest B as a flagrant offender B, and the police officer G was pushed away several times with the body of G, and his her son was assaulted to interfere with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender of G, who is a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of each of the accused in court;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of H, I and J;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and the Defendants who choose punishment: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants’ grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the depth of the Defendants, and the Defendants have no criminal record exceeding the fine, etc. shall be equally determined in light of the overall text of the order.