Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 6, 2017, Defendant A received 112 reports and prevented the police officer’s 112 reports and lawful execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders on the road in front of Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu., the Defendant: (a) the police officer E affiliated with the Sungnam-gu Police Station D police box, who called, sent out, prevented the Defendant; (b) assaulted the above E’s face one time as drinking; and (c) assaulted the police officer F face of the same police officer who tried to arrest a flagrant offender due to a continuous interference with the performance of official duties on one occasion; and (d) interfered with the police officer’s 112 reports and lawful execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and at the same place as above 1 paragraph, tried to arrest Defendant A, a police officer, as a current criminal of interference with the performance of official duties, to prevent such error, Defendant B, a police officer affiliated with Sung-nam Police Station D police box at Sung-nam Police Station D, “I ambling the head of the above G, and assaulted him on one occasion as his head, and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police officer.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement in E, F and G;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136(1) of the relevant Criminal Act on criminal facts

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the commercial concurrence (defendant A);

1. Selection of each fine (in the case of Defendants, the degree of impulse and violence is not very serious; Defendant B is the primary offender and Defendant A does not have the same criminal record; Defendant A does not have the same kind of criminal record; and Defendant’s mistake and reflects, etc.);

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of the workhouse (defendants)

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act