beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s successor intervenor’s KRW 402,901,823 as well as the Plaintiff’s year from March 14, 2011 to February 20, 2013.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition (1) B, around 15:30 on March 14, 201, 201, driven a 111-on-road Poson Poson Poson apartment in the front of the 111-on Mason Mason Mason (hereinafter “Hason Poson”) and neglected to perform the duty of Mason Poson Poson on the road in front of the 111-on Mason Mason Mason 111 on the 110-on 111 on the 110-on 11 on the 111 on the 110-on Mason Mason Mason, and suffered injury, such as the
(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the owner to compensate for all damages to be borne by the owner due to an accident resulting from the operation of a harming vehicle. The Defendant’s succeeding intervenor is an insurance company that acquired all the status and business of the Defendant’s insurance contract within the Republic of Korea on June 1, 2012 with the authorization of the Financial Services Commission.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 6-2 to 6-51
B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant succeeding intervenor is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the accident in the status of the insurer of the sea-going vehicle.
C. The Defendant’s succeeding intervenor asserts that the Plaintiff’s negligence contributed to the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the instant accident, while crossing the road at the entrance of the parking lot, which is the location of the instant accident, while the Plaintiff was conducting pedestrian practice without permission, and that the Plaintiff’s negligence contributed to the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the instant accident.
However, according to the above recognized evidence, the point where the accident in this case occurred cannot be seen as a place where the crosswalk is separately installed or it is generally expected to be limited to the method of passage, and 3 p.m. of the time of the accident in this case.