logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.01.09 2013나5020
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Defendant’s successor intervenor 184,097,677 won and its amount.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 15:30 on March 14, 201, B: (a) 15:30 on the road in front of 111 U.S. Madon-U.S. Madon-U.S. Madon-U.S. Madon-U.S. Madon-U.S. Madon-U.S.

2) The Plaintiff 110 and 111 side of the above apartment complex 110 and 111 side of the 110 side of the above apartment complex due to the negligence of neglecting the duty of her driver’s negligence, and caused injury to the Plaintiff, such as a closed throstal pelke, external typosis, chronic cerebral typosis, less than external typosis, and an open top of head cover (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the owner to compensate for all damages to be borne by the owner due to an accident that may arise from the operation of a vehicle in the household, and the Defendant’s succeeding intervenor is an insurance company that took over all insurance contractual status and business status of the Defendant in the Republic of Korea on June 1, 2012 with the authorization of the Financial Services Commission.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1, 6 evidence, Eul's 5 evidence (including each number, if any), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the Defendant’s successor is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident in the status of the insurer of the sea-going vehicle.

C. According to the above admitted evidence, the point where the instant accident occurred is a road in an apartment complex, where pedestrians walk frequently, and it is difficult to predict the passage of pedestrians in the apartment complex during the time when the instant accident occurred (15:30).

Considering the fact that there is no circumstance that it is difficult to distinguish or identify, the main cause of the instant accident is that the driver of the instant vehicle is the driver of the instant accident, but the instant accident is that.

arrow