logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.10.29 2019가단15595
임대차보증금반환
Text

The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 21, 200, I completed the registration of initial ownership as to the 414.00 square meters on the J-ground pelpel structure, the sloping roof, the sloping roof, the sloping roof, the sloping roof, the 287.40 square meters on the sloping roof, the sloping roof, the sloping sloping roof, the 9.00 square meters on the sloping roof, and the 9.00 square meters on the sloping roof, a single-story manager of the sloping roof (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant building”).

B. On July 2, 2015, a fire was caused by an electrical cause in the surrounding area, including the distribution of the portion of 143.7 square meters in south of 287.40 square meters (hereinafter “the leased part of this case”), among the sloping roof of the instant building, a sloping roof of a pipe structure, bean industry, or a water cultivation company. This was caused by a fire (hereinafter “the fire of this case”) that destroyed the machinery, etc. located within the instant building by setting the remainder of the instant building through a cover cover for visible-use installed on the instant building and a wall between the instant building.

C. Following I’s death on November 17, 2015, Defendant C, the inheritor, completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the following reasons: (a) share of 3/13 of the instant building; and (b) the remaining Defendants completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of 2/13 shares of each of the instant building on May 30, 2016.

K (A lessee of North-North 143.7 square meters in the 287.40 square meters in the sloping structure of the instant building) and L (a lessee of the 99.00 square meters in the sloping structure of the instant building) filed a lawsuit against the Defendants, etc. seeking compensation for damages caused by the instant fire.

On February 22, 2018, the above court dismissed the main claim against B and tort liability against the Defendants, etc., and rendered a judgment citing part of the conjunctive claim seeking the liability against the Defendants, etc. (hereinafter “related case judgment”), and around that time, the related case judgment became final and conclusive.

[Ground of recognition] dispute.

arrow