logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.08.25 2016가단32384
배당이의의 소
Text

1. As to the case of request for a voluntary auction of real estate, the above court prepared on October 24, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In the procedure of the auction of real estate auction (hereinafter “instant auction procedure”), the said court opened on October 24, 2016 the date of distribution and prepared a distribution schedule with the following contents.

The creditor of Eunpyeong-gun (Delivery, Beneficiary, Beneficiary, Beneficiary on the date of the determination), Defendant E (Right of Delivery, Beneficiary, Beneficiary on the date of the determination), Plaintiff F (Mortgage mortgagee) G (Mortgage mortgagee, Beneficiary) G (Mortgage mortgagee, Beneficiary) 1 (Right of Collateral) 70,000,000 192,1371,760,531,531,327,4181,093,327,419,41927,9192,9192,942,1330,1377,760,531,531, 109, and 100% of the dividend rate of 100%,57587,875.75%,875%,875%,57,875%,875%,57,87,50%, 100%, of the dividend rate of 10%.

B. The objects subject to the auction procedure of this case are as follows.

(6) On December 3, 1995, the land category was changed to a site around the time when Gyeonggi-do Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City and 8,731m2. (hereinafter referred to as “instant site”).

C. The defendant on October 16, 2002

arrow