1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The owner of the business of taking over the above D 3th floor from Defendant B. Defendant B conspired to take charge of the operation of the above D 10,000 won and the role of guiding customers in accordance with the promise of customers due to the relationship in which Defendant A did not receive the above D 10,000 won, and Defendant C also received the money from Defendant A to take charge of the operation and publicity of the above D 10,000 won, and to act as a broker for customers through sexual intercourse with the above D 10,000 won from May 22, 2015 to July 30, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect B of the police (two times);

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. On-site photographs;

1. A housing lease contract;

1. Efaging the Internet publicity site;

1. Protocols of seizure, list of seizure and evidence of seizure;

1. Each investigation report (Submission of data, response to data, and analysis of the details of passbooks);

1. Details of transactions of deposits and withdrawals;

1. Details of mobile phone numbers for the notification of deposit and withdrawal;

1. Protective photographs;

1. Application of the statutes governing H dialogues

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 19(2)1 of the Criminal Act, Articles 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, which provides a suspended sentence (the Defendants)

1. A community service order (the Defendants) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (hereinafter referred to as “the Defendants”)’ act of arranging sexual traffic with reasons for sentencing is a highly harmful crime, such as undermining the sound sexual morals. Considering the fact that the period of the Defendants’ business operation is shorter, and that the amount of profit does not seem to exceed a certain amount, the Defendants’ criminal liability is not easy.

(b).