logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.27 2016고단696 (1)
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine not exceeding six million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine not exceeding four million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a type of business that arranges the act of similarity in the operation of a non-affiliated camera in the name of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C and 2, and Defendant B is an employee in charge of Internet advertising posts, customer guidance, and a camera.

From July 6, 2015 to July 15, 2015, Defendants conspired to receive 15 to 39,000 won, 20 to 20 to 49,000 won in return for the act of similarity from male customers who find the place, and let E (n, 28 years of age), F (n, 25 years of age) who is an employee of the above business place, etc. take the sexual organ of customers in hand and do the act of similarity, such as putting them in scam and scam, thereby mediating sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants and joint Defendants E’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol concerning the interrogation of the police officers against the Defendants, E, and F

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (calculated an additional collection charge);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 19(2)1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (Involving the Defendants), Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (i.e., selection of fines, the period of business operation, the period of business operation is ten days, and there is no record of being punished for the same kind of crime and reflect, etc.);

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, each of the Defendants’ detention in a workhouse

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. (Defendant A);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not less than 334(1).

arrow