logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1984. 3. 27. 선고 83누531 판결
[양도소득세부과처분취소][공1984.6.1.(729),826]
Main Issues

Transfer of title trust property and imposition of capital gains tax on title trustee;

Summary of Judgment

If the Plaintiff, the nominal owner of the instant real estate, obtained title trust from Nonparty (A) or completed the registration of ownership transfer to Nonparty (B), and did not receive any consideration or profit therefrom, the actual owner of the instant real estate and the transferor are Nonparty (A) and the Plaintiff merely is a title trustee, and the taxation imposing capital gains tax on the Plaintiff is unlawful in violation of the substance over form principle.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 7 of the Income Tax Act, Article 14 of the Framework Act on National Taxes, Article 1 of the Trust Act

Plaintiff-Appellee

Plaintiff (Attorney Kim Tae-tae, Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant-Appellant

Gangwon-gu Director of the District Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 83Gu107 delivered on July 25, 1983

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

Each ground of appeal by the defendant litigation performer shall be examined together.

According to the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below determined that the real estate in its judgment based on macroficial evidence is acquired by three persons including the plaintiff, etc. from the Dok Construction Co., Ltd. and transferred it to the Dok Construction Co., Ltd., but in fact, the non-party lent KRW 300 million to the Dok Construction Co., Ltd. and entrusted the ownership transfer registration to the non-party Dok Construction Co., Ltd. in the name of three persons including the plaintiff et al., and disposed of KRW 353,040,00, and the non-party 3 did not receive any price or profit by receiving the title trust from the above non-party or completing the ownership transfer registration from the non-party Dok Construction Co., Ltd., the actual owner and the transferor of the real estate in its judgment, and the plaintiff merely acquired 1/3 of the share of the real estate in its judgment, and the defendant's taxation that imposed capital gains tax, etc. on the plaintiff is unlawful since the plaintiff merely acquired the title trustee.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Yoon Il-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1983.7.25.선고 83구107