logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.06.29 2017구합88312
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the attached list 3 of the Defendant’s refusal to disclose information to the Plaintiff on September 19, 2017 against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. (1) On September 8, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant to disclose each information listed in attached Tables 1 through 3 to the Defendant on September 8, 2017. (2) On September 19, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision to refuse the disclosure of each information described in attached Tables 1 and 2, on the ground that each of the information listed in attached Tables 1 and 1 and 2, “the part containing personal information of tin members,” “the part concerning disclosure of other types of occupation outside B,” and “the part related to disclosure of the test type of occupation” includes both the matters concerning the examination and the matters related to the decision-making process or internal review process, and thus, if disclosed, it constitutes an obstacle to fair management of the test.

(hereinafter referred to as “first disposition”). (b)

Article 2-1 Information Disclosure Refusal Disposition 1) On December 5, 2017, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to disclose each information listed in [Attachment List 4 and 5] On December 18, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision to refuse disclosure on the ground that there is no information listed in [Attachment List 4] on December 18, 2017, on the grounds that there is no information listed in [Attachment List 5], “the part concerning disclosure of test type of other types of occupation outside B” includes the matters set forth in Article 9(1)5 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”) and the matters in the decision-making process or internal review process, which would hinder fair management of the test if disclosed.

(hereinafter referred to as “Article 2-1 Disposition”). (c)

1) On December 6, 2017, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to disclose each information listed in the [Attachment 6 and 7] List to the Defendant on December 6, 2017. 2) The Defendant: (a) on December 18, 2017, on the ground that there is no survey on interested persons and no “public hearing data” among the information listed in the [Attachment 6] List 7, the information is in the process of decision-making or internal review.

arrow